Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
361. Low Sec, Player Resistance and GREED!!!!!four - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Anaalys Fluuterby on 30/05/2008 21:54:34 No hulk ever fitted, at any cost, will survive to a PvP fitted ship. Not survive, not even long enough to warp out. Unless of course the pirate is completely inexperienced or a moron. You ar...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.30 21:53:00
|
362. Dev's Macro Miner's and how to stop them. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Anaalys Fluuterby on 30/05/2008 21:42:20 Tried before, doesn't work. 1) I would assume macros are programed well enough that they also read the "type" from the overview, not just the name. 2) Locking on something doesn't give shoo...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.30 21:41:00
|
363. How long do complexs stay up? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
If it is a dynamic complex found through exploration, it will despawn either when a certain trigger is tripped while running it or 72 hrs after it is found, whichever comes first. Originally by: CCP Wrangler Not it isn't, people should b...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.29 22:09:00
|
364. IS THIS AN EXPLOIT - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
This sounds like what happened to one of our corpmates a couple of weeks ago. He warped into the last pocket of a mission and there was a flashy ship waiting. It scrammed and fired before he did without concord intervention. He petitioned the los...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.29 22:07:00
|
365. Enough with all the NANO figs? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Hannobaal I was gonna say 'because that's a stupidly one-sided fleet of heavy ships that really shouldn't be effective at all against a fleet of smaller faster ones'... ...but actually a fleet of 40 dominix with remote rep...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.28 06:46:00
|
366. Enough with all the NANO figs? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Imperator Jora'h [ So, you are solo and I NEED a fleet to *maybe* kill you? In reality you'll probably just bolt (not being snarky...anyone would...point is I cannot catch your nano if you are paying attention or get unlucky...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.28 06:45:00
|
367. From Rifter to Rupture; Autocannon misses? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Also put on D-180s until you get your tracking skills up. They are noticeably faster and will hit smaller targets easier. Originally by: CCP Wrangler Not it isn't, people should be encouraged to get out in low sec space, but never forced...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.25 17:33:00
|
368. Do you think that 3 k/s is very fast for a Nano ship without a tank ? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Kay Rissa I think this discussion went slightly differnt way ! I wanted to simply find out: IS 3 K/S TOO FAST FOR A CRUISER/HAC without a tank fitted (t2 fit only and no implants) ??? Do you think that this sort of speed i...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.24 23:39:00
|
369. Time for another server hardware upgrade? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Lividicus bump PS - Bumping is against the forum rules At least post something. And yes, this IS a bump because I hope CCP will post in here and tell you "it aint happening", "we know our systems better than you", "go...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.24 22:17:00
|
370. Salvaging exploit - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Anaalys Fluuterby on 24/05/2008 22:14:07 It is not an exploit, and it IS intended game mechanics. CCP has stated so several times. Currently stickied in the Missioning forum: Changes to Wreck ownership Pay particular attention ...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.24 22:13:00
|
371. Mechanic change: Aggressing players with sub-zero sec status. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Won't work. MOST pirates, even in LowSec, have positive security status. Personally I feel Security status is a poorly-thought out way of handling the whole situation; it gets used in some cases as an E-Peen indicator and in most cases is complete...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.24 17:17:00
|
372. isn't bumping to prevent warp anexploit? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Jacob Mei Originally by: Dihania Why would be bumping to prevent warp be an exploit ?! Jeez.... Now bumping someone for fun or just to disrupt their play may be another thing, like when you decide its fun to bump th...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.22 23:59:00
|
373. The cloaking issue - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So, if you nerf cloaks what happens to LowSec and 0.0 Exploration? You know, sitting around forever waiting for the scans to complete? Since you can't warp without breaking your scan, and it can take hours to find a site, you just nerfed Explorat...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.22 15:27:00
|
374. Time for another server hardware upgrade? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Lividicus Pictures of non-relavant stuff *shakes head in sympathy for those that actually believe that vendor-provide example tools actually are similar to real-world server applications of this magnitude* Origi...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.21 23:33:00
|
375. Time for another server hardware upgrade? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Anaalys Fluuterby on 21/05/2008 20:27:02 Originally by: Lividicus You are absolutely 100% wrong. A 1.8Ghz opteron cannot even come close to competing with a even a 1.8Ghz Allendale with 1MB of cache, let alone Clovertown ...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.21 20:24:00
|
376. Time for another server hardware upgrade? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Lividicus In absolutely no case have multi-core x86 CPUs been slower than their predecessor single core CPUs. The IPC of even a Core 2 Solo is significantly faster than the Pentium 4 architure that preceeded it. Hence why...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.21 19:45:00
|
377. Time for another server hardware upgrade? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Lividicus Hence my suggestion that now is a great time to buy, even if it was only to update the heaviest zones. Prices are extremely low on mid-high end hardware, and from the last hardware update i can wager that CCP has ...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.21 19:43:00
|
378. Time for another server hardware upgrade? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Maar T'Kmel I wonder why we talk about "normal" servers with quad cores, DDR3, etc. Would CCP not benefit from small super-computer-type setups? Since 99.99% of Eve is probably just number-crunching, use computers that are m...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.21 17:53:00
|
379. recharge amount should be static - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CrestoftheStars and where do you find these numbers? where in the database do you see this, where is the explanation on this ?! i haven't been able to find it as a fact that ccp have written down... Go look at Pottsey's ...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.21 17:37:00
|
380. Is this the aftermath of a freighter gank? - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
There always seems to be a group of friendlies there Maybe because it is the only HighSec path between Caldari and Amarr space that doesn't go through Gal or Minnie territory for those shot on sight mission runner types... Originally by: ...
- by Anaalys Fluuterby - at 2008.05.21 01:45:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |